Xiangdong Chen and Zhaofeng Li, University of Utah; Tirth Jain, Maya Labs; Vikram Narayanan and Anton Burtsev, University of Utah
A surge in the number, complexity, and automation of targeted security attacks has triggered a wave of interest in hardware support for isolation. Intel memory protection keys (MPK), ARM pointer authentication (PAC), ARM memory tagging extensions (MTE), and ARM Morello capabilities are just a few hardware mechanisms aimed at supporting low-overhead isolation in recent CPUs. These new mechanisms aim to bring practical isolation to a broad range of systems, e.g., browser plugins, device drivers and kernel extensions, user-defined database and network functions, serverless cloud platforms, and many more. However, as these technologies are still nascent, their advantages and limitations are yet unclear. In this work, we do an in-depth look at modern hardware isolation mechanisms with the goal of understanding their suitability for the isolation of subsystems with the tightest performance budgets. Our analysis shows that while a huge step forward, the isolation mechanisms in commodity CPUs are still lacking implementation of several design principles critical for supporting low-overhead enforcement of isolation boundaries, zero-copy exchange of data, and secure revocation of access permissions.
