sponsors
help promote
usenix conference policies
Cloud Spot Markets are Not Sustainable: The Case for Transient Guarantees
Supreeth Subramanya, Amr Rizk, and David Irwin, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Computational spot markets enable users to bid on servers, and then continuously allocates them to the highest bidder: if a user is “out bid” for a server, the market revokes it and re-allocates it to the new highest bidder. Spot markets are common when trading commodities to balance real-time supply and demand—cloud platforms use them to sell their idle capacity, which varies over time. However, server-time differs from other commodities in that it is “stateful”: losing a spot server incurs an overhead that decreases the useful work it performs. Thus, variations in the spot price actually affect the inherent value of server-time bought in the spot market. As the spot market matures, we argue that price volatility will significantly decrease the value of spot servers. Thus, somewhat counter-intuitively, spot markets may not maximize the value of idle server capacity. To address the problem, we propose a more sustainable alternative that offers a variable amount of idle capacity to users for a fixed price, but with transient guarantees
Open Access Media
USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. Papers and proceedings are freely available to everyone once the event begins. Any video, audio, and/or slides that are posted after the event are also free and open to everyone. Support USENIX and our commitment to Open Access.
author = {Supreeth Subramanya and Amr Rizk and David Irwin},
title = {Cloud Spot Markets are Not Sustainable: The Case for Transient Guarantees},
booktitle = {8th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud 16)},
year = {2016},
address = {Denver, CO},
url = {https://www.usenix.org/conference/hotcloud16/workshop-program/presentation/subramanya},
publisher = {USENIX Association},
month = jun
}
connect with us