The simplest means of resolving a dispute is for the auctioneers to send all components to a trusted authority. The accuracy of the components can be verified by the signatures, and then the precise bid can be determined. The drawback of this method of resolution is that the authority will learn the exact value of the bid. However, for the auctioneers to inaccurately determine a winner, there must be a coalition of auctioneers large enough to determine the bid themselves, each member of which is corrupt or faulty. So the bid may already be known to the corrupt auctioneers.
Another method for resolving such a dispute is to perform a greatly simplified version of the auction. This simplified auction may be performed as a check by the auctioneers, to ensure that the winner was not selected incorrectly. Additionally, the shares possessed by the auctioneers (signed by the bidder) may be transferred to some other distributed authority, which will perform the check to resolve disputes. This simplified auction is performed with 3 bids: the disputed ``winning'' bid and two known bids and (where is the selling price determined by the disputed auction). If this auction returns a selling price of , then the auction was correct; if it returns a selling price of , it was incorrect. The result of the auction is always or and thus reveals no information other than whether the questioned bid is less than .