USENIX supports diversity, equity, and inclusion and condemns hate and discrimination.
Code Testing through Fault Injection
;login: Enters a New Phase of Its Evolution
For over 20 years, ;login: has been a print magazine with a digital version; in the two decades previous, it was USENIX’s newsletter, UNIX News. Since its inception 45 years ago, it has served as a medium through which the USENIX community learns about useful tools, research, and events from one another. Beginning in 2021, ;login: will no longer be the formally published print magazine as we’ve known it most recently, but rather reimagined as a digital publication with increased opportunities for interactivity among authors and readers.
Since USENIX became an open access publisher of papers in 2008, ;login: has remained our only content behind a membership paywall. In keeping with our commitment to open access, all ;login: content will be open to everyone when we make this change. However, only USENIX members at the sustainer level or higher, as well as student members, will have exclusive access to the interactivity options. Rik Farrow, the current editor of the magazine, will continue to provide leadership for the overall content offered in ;login:, which will be released via our website on a regular basis throughout the year.
As we plan to launch this new format, we are forming an editorial committee of volunteers from throughout the USENIX community to curate content, meaning that this will be a formally peer-reviewed publication. This new model will increase opportunities for the community to contribute to ;login: and engage with its content. In addition to written articles, we are open to other ideas of what you might want to experience.
Several years ago a friend of mine did some robustness testing on a widely used OpenSource Software Library. He instrumented the malloc()
call so that it would fail (return a NULL pointer/out-of-memory error) the first time that it was called. On the second program run it would fail the second time that it was called, on the next run the third time, and so on. Then he fired up a test suite wrapper for the library and ran it using the fault-inducing malloc()
.
Luckily, he’d had the foresight to hard-limit the script he was using to stop after a thousand core dumps rather than running through the full test suite wrapper. The hard drive on his computer still hasn’t forgiven him for the thrashing it got, though. So why did something as simple as a memory allocation failure cause such havoc?