usenix conference policies
Provenance as a Security Control
12 Tuesday | 13 Wednesday | 14 Thursday | 15 Friday |
---|---|---|---|
HotCloud '12 | TaPP '12 | ||
WiAC '12 | USENIX ATC '12 | ||
UCMS '12 | HotStorage '12 | NSDR '12 | |
USENIX Cyberlaw '12 | WebApps '12 |
Error message
You are not authorized to post comments.Andrew Martin, John Lyle, and Cornelius Namilkuo, University of Oxford
Much has been written about security and provenance. Although both have their own large areas of concern, there is a very significant intersection. One is often brought to bear upon the other, in the study of the security of provenance. We discuss through a series of examples how provenance might be regarded as a security control in its own right. We argue that a risk-based approach to provenance is appropriate, and is already being used informally. A case study illustrates the applicability of this line of reasoning.
Open Access Media
USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. Papers and proceedings are freely available to everyone once the event begins. Any video, audio, and/or slides that are posted after the event are also free and open to everyone. Support USENIX and our commitment to Open Access.
title = {Provenance as a Security Control},
booktitle = {4th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (TaPP 12)},
year = {2012},
address = {Boston, MA},
url = {https://www.usenix.org/conference/tapp12/workshop-program/presentation/Martin},
publisher = {USENIX Association},
month = jun
}
connect with us